Trusted types integration dom #6057
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
tete17
force-pushed
the
Trusted-types-integration-dom
branch
from
3b2562d to
be7bf5b
Compare
github-actions
bot
added
the
conflicts
|
Your pull request has conflicts that need to be resolved before it can be reviewed and merged. Make sure to rebase your branch on top of the latest |
tete17
force-pushed
the
Trusted-types-integration-dom
branch
from
be7bf5b to
75accf6
Compare
github-actions
bot
removed
the
conflicts
tete17
force-pushed
the
Trusted-types-integration-dom
branch
from
75accf6 to
db339f5
Compare
github-actions
bot
added
the
conflicts
|
Your pull request has conflicts that need to be resolved before it can be reviewed and merged. Make sure to rebase your branch on top of the latest |
tete17
force-pushed
the
Trusted-types-integration-dom
branch
from
db339f5 to
6ffd0c1
Compare
github-actions
bot
removed
the
conflicts
tete17
force-pushed
the
Trusted-types-integration-dom
branch
2 times, most recently
from
0e42cd9 to
97a6433
Compare
tete17
force-pushed
the
Trusted-types-integration-dom
branch
from
97a6433 to
bc7ee2e
Compare
Lubrsi
requested changes
Oct 12, 2025
Contributor
Lubrsi
left a comment
Lubrsi
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good work, here's a handful of issues I found
tete17
force-pushed
the
Trusted-types-integration-dom
branch
3 times, most recently
from
f548e86 to
658f63f
Compare
github-actions
bot
added
the
conflicts
|
Your pull request has conflicts that need to be resolved before it can be reviewed and merged. Make sure to rebase your branch on top of the latest |
tete17
force-pushed
the
Trusted-types-integration-dom
branch
from
658f63f to
f340bbd
Compare
github-actions
bot
removed
the
conflicts
tete17
force-pushed
the
Trusted-types-integration-dom
branch
2 times, most recently
from
fa0ea61 to
a76bf66
Compare
This part of the spec is still under a PR in GitHub, but it should be safe to implement like it is.
This function was supposed to throw errors even before the TrustedTypes spec thanks to the CharacterData replaceData call but had a MUST. This changes this to ensure this function can throw an error
tete17
force-pushed
the
Trusted-types-integration-dom
branch
from
a76bf66 to
78de0e2
Compare
Lubrsi
approved these changes
Oct 27, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This should cover most of the integration with TrustedTypes and the DOM apis
In particular this is the work required to implement Section 4.2 of the TrustedTypes Spec.
It follows the MR of whatwg/dom#1268 as close as we can given it is not merged yet.
There is 2 special points we need to be aware of:
execCommandis ad-hoc since that standard was abandoned. There are some WPT test to cover them and my goal was to make the test pass and what made sense in my head.csp-violations.jsbut it means we won't see them in our official WPT score until we solve https://github.com/LadybirdBrowser/ladybird/blob/master/Libraries/LibWeb/WebSockets/WebSocket.cpp#L191. I gave it quick try with not much hope but it is clearly outside the scope of this MR.