Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create snyk-security.yml #7

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

davidmerwin
Copy link
Member

@davidmerwin davidmerwin commented Dec 29, 2023

Type

enhancement


Description

This PR introduces a new GitHub Actions workflow for Snyk Security. The main changes include:

  • The addition of a new workflow file .github/workflows/snyk-security.yml.
  • The workflow is set to run on push and pull_request events on the main and Map branches.
  • The workflow sets up the Snyk CLI and runs various Snyk tests (Snyk Code, Snyk Open Source, Snyk IaC, and Snyk Container).
  • The results of the Snyk Code tests are uploaded to GitHub Code Scanning.

PR changes walkthrough

Relevant files                                                                                                                                 
Configuration changes
1 files
snyk-security.yml                                                                                     
    .github/workflows/snyk-security.yml

    The changes in this file include the addition of a new
    workflow for Snyk Security. This workflow is designed to
    analyze the full Snyk platform (Snyk Open Source, Snyk Code,
    Snyk Container, and Snyk Infrastructure as Code). The
    workflow is triggered on push and pull request events on the
    "main" and "Map" branches. It sets up the Snyk CLI, runs
    Snyk Code, Snyk Open Source, Snyk IaC, and Snyk Container
    tests, and uploads the results to GitHub Code Scanning.

+79/-0

User description

#5 (comment) #5 @carrietian099 @LangMers/langmers-systems

Signed-off-by: David Jeffrey Merwin <[email protected]>
@davidmerwin davidmerwin added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Dec 29, 2023
Copy link

Hi there! 👋 Thanks for opening a PR. 🎉 To get the most out of Senior Dev, please sign up in our Web App, connect your GitHub account, and add/join your organization LangMers. After that, you will receive code reviews beginning on your next opened PR. 🚀

Copy link

quine-bot bot commented Dec 29, 2023

👋 Figuring out if a PR is useful is hard, hopefully this will help.

  • @davidmerwin has been on GitHub since 2019 and in that time has had 4 public PRs merged
  • Don't you recognize them? They've been here before 🎉
  • Here's a good example of their work: LangMersSystems (Say it. Learn it. Live it.)
  • From looking at their profile, they seem to be good with Makefile and Python.

Their most recently public accepted PR is: davidmerwin1992/upgraded-journey#1

@the-label-bot the-label-bot bot added kind/feature kind/feature size/M size/M labels Dec 29, 2023
Copy link

the-label-bot bot commented Dec 29, 2023

The Label Bot has predicted the following:

Category Value Confidence Applied Label
Kind feature 0.949 ✔️
Kind M 0.984 ✔️

@codiumai-pr-agent-pro codiumai-pr-agent-pro bot added enhancement New feature or request and removed documentation Improvements or additions to documentation labels Dec 29, 2023
Copy link

PR Description updated to latest commit (6d39cc8)

1 similar comment
Copy link

PR Description updated to latest commit (6d39cc8)

Copy link

codiumai-pr-agent-pro bot commented Dec 29, 2023

PR Analysis

(review updated until commit 6d39cc8)

  • 🎯 Main theme: Adding Snyk Security GitHub Actions workflow
  • 📝 PR summary: This PR introduces a new GitHub Actions workflow for Snyk Security. The workflow is set to run on push and pull_request events on the main and Map branches. It sets up the Snyk CLI and runs various Snyk tests (Snyk Code, Snyk Open Source, Snyk IaC, and Snyk Container). The results of the Snyk Code tests are uploaded to GitHub Code Scanning.
  • 📌 Type of PR: Enhancement
  • 🧪 Relevant tests added: No
  • ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]: 2, because the PR mainly involves the addition of a new GitHub Actions workflow file, which is straightforward and does not involve complex logic or changes to existing code.
  • 🔒 Security concerns: No

PR Feedback

💡 General suggestions: The PR is well-structured and the addition of the Snyk Security workflow is a good enhancement for the project. However, it would be beneficial to include some form of testing or validation to ensure that the workflow is functioning as expected.

🤖 Code feedback:
relevant file.github/workflows/snyk-security.yml
suggestion      

Consider adding a step to handle failures in the Snyk tests. Currently, the workflow does not seem to handle or report failures in the Snyk tests, which could lead to unnoticed security vulnerabilities. [important]

relevant linerun: snyk code test --sarif > snyk-code.sarif # || true

relevant file.github/workflows/snyk-security.yml
suggestion      

Ensure that the SNYK_TOKEN secret is set in the GitHub repository settings. Without this, the Snyk CLI will not be able to authenticate and the workflow will fail. [important]

relevant lineSNYK_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.SNYK_TOKEN }}

✨ Usage tips:

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:

  • /review: Request a review of your Pull Request.
  • /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
  • /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.
  • /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.
  • /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.
  • /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.
  • /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.
  • /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component.

See the tools guide for more details.
To edit any configuration parameter from the configuration.toml, add --config_path=new_value.
For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..."
To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

Copy link

Persistent review updated to latest commit 6d39cc8

@davidmerwin davidmerwin mentioned this pull request Dec 29, 2023
Copy link

Stale pull request message

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request kind/feature kind/feature no-pr-activity size/M size/M
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants