Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade leo-sdk from 6.0.17-rc to 6.0.18 #42

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ch-snyk-sa
Copy link

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to upgrade leo-sdk from 6.0.17-rc to 6.0.18.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 4 versions ahead of your current version.
  • The recommended version was released 2 months ago, on 2023-11-29.
Release notes
Package name: leo-sdk from leo-sdk GitHub release notes
Commit messages
Package name: leo-sdk
  • e43bdc0 Merge pull request #191 from LeoPlatform/feature/install-aws-sdk-no-save
  • 996774f Update npm-publish.yml
  • 0a15c51 Merge pull request #181 from LeoPlatform/feature/leos3-timeout
  • 9fa6f6d fixing logic on buffer for getOwner
  • d68738f changed time to 200 ms instead of 200 seconds
  • bb22a0d Made leoS3 honor a time limit for the entire s3 file and to include in its time the time for the first chunk
  • e94a8c1 Merge pull request #179 from LeoPlatform/feature/fast_s3_read_1_5
  • 534c004 Added new fast_s3_read parameter fast_s3_read_timeout_retry_count
  • a5ece4c Catch s3 timeouts when using fast_s3_read and reconnect the file

Compare


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust upgrade PR settings

🔕 Ignore this dependency or unsubscribe from future upgrade PRs

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants