chore: change slack channel to helm doc upgrade notify workflow - #642
Conversation
Summary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughThe Helm upgrade documentation workflow now documents, declares, and passes the generic ChangesHelm upgrade Slack notification
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels: Suggested reviewers: 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
🔍 Lint Analysis
|
🔍 PR Validation Summary✅ PR Mergeable — no blocking failures
|
🛡️ CodeQL Analysis ResultsLanguages analyzed: ✅ No security issues found. 🔍 View full scan logs | 🛡️ Security tab |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Warning
CodeRabbit couldn't request changes on this pull request because it doesn't have sufficient GitHub permissions.
Please grant CodeRabbit Pull requests: Read and write permission and re-run the review.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In @.github/workflows/helm-upgrade-doc.yml:
- Line 61: Update the reusable workflow contract and its callers to handle the
SLACK_CHANNEL_DEVOPS to SLACK_CHANNEL_OPS rename consistently: either retain
SLACK_CHANNEL_DEVOPS as a temporary fallback or migrate every caller and update
docs/helm-upgrade-doc.md to SLACK_CHANNEL_OPS. Mark the rename as a breaking
change in the relevant workflow documentation or release metadata, while
preserving Slack notifications for existing callers.
🪄 Autofix
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
Run ID: be8e3060-2031-43dd-8ab6-882d4b042bc3
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/helm-upgrade-doc.yml
…ions The notification channel was a channel-specific secret (SLACK_CHANNEL_OPS, previously SLACK_CHANNEL_DEVOPS), so switching channels meant renaming the secret here and opening a PR in shared-workflows. Rename it to a generic SLACK_CHANNEL so callers control the channel from their own workflow (org secret SLACK_CHANNEL via secrets: inherit, or an explicit secret mapping to target a different channel) — no change to this shared workflow needed to switch channels. X-Lerian-Ref: 0x1
4395d24
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Warning
CodeRabbit couldn't request changes on this pull request because it doesn't have sufficient GitHub permissions.
Please grant CodeRabbit Pull requests: Read and write permission and re-run the review.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In @.github/workflows/helm-upgrade-doc.yml:
- Around line 17-24: Preserve backward compatibility for the Slack channel
secret used by the reusable workflow: update the notification steps around the
SLACK_CHANNEL references to fall back to SLACK_CHANNEL_DEVOPS when SLACK_CHANNEL
is unset, or update all callers and explicitly document the rename as breaking.
Verify repository callers and references to helm-upgrade-doc and both secret
names before completing the change.
🪄 Autofix
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 96c8d052-2f14-4d8e-91e0-083130214838
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/helm-upgrade-doc.yml
…CHANNEL Follow-up to #643 (which merged the generic SLACK_CHANNEL in the workflow but left the doc stale). docs/helm-upgrade-doc.md still listed SLACK_CHANNEL_DEVOPS; update it to SLACK_CHANNEL with a note on mapping a channel secret in the caller. Closes the CodeRabbit doc-consistency finding. X-Lerian-Ref: 0x1
…nherit Address CodeRabbit: note that secrets: inherit matches by name and does not rename SLACK_CHANNEL_OPS to SLACK_CHANNEL — callers need a secret named SLACK_CHANNEL, or an explicit secrets mapping (inherit cannot be combined with an explicit secrets block). X-Lerian-Ref: 0x1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Warning
CodeRabbit couldn't request changes on this pull request because it doesn't have sufficient GitHub permissions.
Please grant CodeRabbit Pull requests: Read and write permission and re-run the review.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@docs/helm-upgrade-doc.md`:
- Line 119: Remove the blank line at the identified location in the blockquote
within helm-upgrade-doc.md so the consecutive blockquote paragraphs remain
contiguous and comply with markdownlint MD028.
🪄 Autofix
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
Run ID: abae83a4-480c-4050-b56d-846c6977ed25
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/helm-upgrade-doc.md
GitHub Actions Shared Workflows
Description
Type of Change
feat: New workflow or new input/output/step in an existing workflowfix: Bug fix in a workflow (incorrect behavior, broken step, wrong condition)perf: Performance improvement (e.g. caching, parallelism, reduced steps)refactor: Internal restructuring with no behavior changedocs: Documentation only (README, docs/, inline comments)ci: Changes to self-CI (workflows under.github/workflows/that run on this repo)chore: Dependency bumps, config updates, maintenancetest: Adding or updating testsBREAKING CHANGE: Callers must update their configuration after this PRBreaking Changes
None.
Testing
@this-branchor the beta tagCaller repo / workflow run:
Related Issues
Closes #