Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update docker-compose.yaml #209

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

arpitkhameshra
Copy link

@arpitkhameshra arpitkhameshra commented Aug 17, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced deployment process for the web service, allowing for local builds from the current directory, improving flexibility in customizing the application environment.

@arpitkhameshra arpitkhameshra marked this pull request as draft August 17, 2024 08:20
@arpitkhameshra arpitkhameshra marked this pull request as ready for review August 17, 2024 08:20
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 17, 2024

Walkthrough

The primary change involves the docker-compose.yaml configuration, specifically adding the build: . directive to the web service. This adjustment shifts the image generation process from relying on a remote registry to building the image locally from the current directory. This enhancement empowers developers with greater flexibility for customization and testing during local development, streamlining the workflow before deployment.

Changes

File Change Summary
docker-compose.yaml Added build: . directive to the web service

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Developer
    participant Docker
    participant Registry

    Developer->>Docker: Modify application code
    Developer->>Docker: Run 'docker-compose up'
    Docker->>Docker: Build image from Dockerfile
    Docker->>Docker: Start web service
    Docker->>Developer: Web service running locally
Loading

Poem

🐇 In a world of code, I hop with glee,
A build from the source, how lovely to see!
With each little change, I bounce and play,
My app grows stronger, day by day!
So here’s to the builds, both fresh and bright,
Let's code and create, until the night! 🌙✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between de951ca and 91c9f6d.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • docker-compose.yaml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
docker-compose.yaml (1)

5-5: Clarify the use of both build and image directives.

The build: . directive specifies building the image locally from the Dockerfile in the current directory, while the image directive specifies a pre-built image from a registry. Using both can lead to ambiguity. Consider removing the image directive if the intention is to build locally, or clarify the intended behavior in documentation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant