Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update todo.ejs #215

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion Dockerfile
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
FROM node:12.2.0-alpine
WORKDIR app
COPY . .
RUN npm install
RUN npm install -g npm@latest
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

💡 Codebase verification

⚠️ Potential issue

Dependencies are not installed due to removal of npm install

The Dockerfile change replaces the installation of project dependencies with a global update of npm. While package.json and app.js are present, omitting RUN npm install means the required dependencies won't be installed, leading to potential runtime issues.

Recommended Actions:

  1. Re-add the dependency installation step:

    - RUN npm install -g npm@latest
    + RUN npm install
  2. If updating npm is necessary, do so before installing dependencies:

    + RUN npm install -g npm@latest
    + RUN npm install

    However, it's advisable to use a specific npm version via the base image to ensure build consistency.

🔗 Analysis chain

Revert npm update and ensure project dependencies are installed

The current change replaces the installation of project dependencies with a global update of npm. This will likely cause issues when running the application, as the required dependencies won't be available.

Please consider the following changes:

  1. Revert the npm update:

    -RUN npm install -g npm@latest
    +RUN npm install
  2. If updating npm is necessary, consider adding it before installing dependencies:

    +RUN npm install -g npm@latest
    +RUN npm install

However, updating npm in the Dockerfile is generally not recommended as it can lead to inconsistent builds. It's better to use a specific npm version that comes with the chosen Node.js image.

Consider using a more specific Node.js image version (e.g., node:12.2.0-alpine) to ensure consistent npm versions across builds. If a newer npm version is required, update the base image instead of installing npm separately.

To ensure that the application can still run after these changes, you may want to verify the following:

This script will help verify that the necessary files for running the application are present and that there are dependencies specified in package.json.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if package.json exists and contains dependencies
if [ -f package.json ]; then
  echo "package.json found. Checking for dependencies..."
  jq '.dependencies' package.json
else
  echo "package.json not found. Please ensure it exists in the project root."
fi

# Check if app.js exists (as it's used in the CMD instruction)
if [ -f app.js ]; then
  echo "app.js found."
else
  echo "Warning: app.js not found. Please ensure it exists in the project root."
fi

Length of output: 351

EXPOSE 8000
CMD ["node","app.js"]
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion views/todo.ejs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
</head>

<body>
<h1>TrainWithShubham Community is Super Awesome</h1>
<h1>To -do- list Made by Rishabh Varshney</h1>
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

Consider refining the heading for clarity and professionalism.

While the new heading is more specific to the application, there are a few points to consider:

  1. The formatting of "To -do-" is unconventional and might be confusing. Consider using "To-Do List" or "Todo List" instead.
  2. Including the developer's name in the heading might not be necessary for a production application and could be moved to a footer or about page.

Here's a suggested improvement:

-        <h1>To -do- list Made by Rishabh Varshney</h1>
+        <h1>Todo List</h1>

If you want to keep the credit, consider adding it in a subtle way, such as:

        <h1>Todo List</h1>
        <p class="credit">Created by Rishabh Varshney</p>

<ul>
<% todolist.forEach(function(todo, index) { %>
<li>
Expand Down