Skip to content

refactor: use cargo-package instead of cargo-publish #15

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
paolobarbolini merged 1 commit into from
Apr 2, 2024
Merged

refactor: use cargo-package instead of cargo-publish #15

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
14 changes: 5 additions & 9 deletions src/main.rs
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -424,7 +424,7 @@ fn main() -> Result<()> {
}

//
// Soft publish the package
// Create local package
//

let package_path = repo_dir
Expand All @@ -433,24 +433,20 @@ fn main() -> Result<()> {
.join(format!("{}-{}.crate", package.name, package.version));

if !package_path.try_exists()? {
println!(
"Soft publishing release {} v{}",
package.name, package.version
);
println!("Packaging release {} v{}", package.name, package.version);

let out = Command::new("cargo")
.arg("publish")
.arg("--dry-run")
.arg("package")
.arg("--no-verify")
.arg("--package")
.arg(package.name.as_str())
.current_dir(&repo_dir)
.env("RUSTUP_TOOLCHAIN", &default_toolchain)
.output()
.context("publish the package")?;
.context("cargo package")?;
if !out.status.success() {
println!(
"Couldn't publish the package in {} repo status={}",
"Couldn't assemble the package in {} repo status={}",
repository, out.status
);
continue;
Expand Down