Skip to content

Conversation

bobbyiliev
Copy link
Contributor

Motivation

Mainly based on the discussion here. Open to suggestions on the exact workding @kay-kim!

Also open to suggestions if it is worth updating the individual create connection examples to also include the region as well? Eg like so, or would it be an overkill?

image

Tips for reviewer

Checklist

  • This PR has adequate test coverage / QA involvement has been duly considered. (trigger-ci for additional test/nightly runs)
  • This PR has an associated up-to-date design doc, is a design doc (template), or is sufficiently small to not require a design.
  • If this PR evolves an existing $T ⇔ Proto$T mapping (possibly in a backwards-incompatible way), then it is tagged with a T-proto label.
  • If this PR will require changes to cloud orchestration or tests, there is a companion cloud PR to account for those changes that is tagged with the release-blocker label (example).
  • If this PR includes major user-facing behavior changes, I have pinged the relevant PM to schedule a changelog post.

@bobbyiliev bobbyiliev requested a review from a team as a code owner October 7, 2025 18:33
@bobbyiliev bobbyiliev requested a review from kay-kim October 7, 2025 18:33
Copy link
Contributor

@kay-kim kay-kim left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! And yes on the example please... that way, Matty can just pull up the example (and less chance of creative constructing 😄 )

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants