Skip to content

rehash review process - #477

Merged
James Bruten (james-bruten-mo) merged 11 commits into
MetOffice:github_wpsfrom
jennyhickson:project
Nov 20, 2025
Merged

rehash review process#477
James Bruten (james-bruten-mo) merged 11 commits into
MetOffice:github_wpsfrom
jennyhickson:project

Conversation

@jennyhickson

@jennyhickson Jenny Hickson (jennyhickson) commented Oct 22, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Updating the review process as we keep refining the details.

Also making reviewer terms more consistant and fixing -\- in macro terms

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we add a note to the scitechreview page saying to tag the code reviewer in some way when passing over the ticket

Comment thread source/Reviewers/scitechreview.rst Outdated
Once you are happy that the change is appropriate and correct, and the sci-tech
review parts of the pull request template have been completed then change
Once you are happy that the change is appropriate and correct, and the SciTech
Review parts of the pull request template have been completed then change

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we should add a box here saying to either add the CR as a reviewer or tag them in a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

turned things the scitech should do into a list, but not in a box. Is that enough?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, that clarifies that they need to nudge the CR on approval - cheers

@james-bruten-mo
James Bruten (james-bruten-mo) merged commit 9bff364 into MetOffice:github_wps Nov 20, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants