Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update data-residency.md #125480

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

rpakala-ms
Copy link
Contributor

Adding Go-Local tenant directory quota limits

Adding Go-Local tenant quota limits
Copy link
Contributor

@rpakala-ms : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) have been notified to review your proposed change.

Copy link
Contributor

Learn Build status updates of commit a3432a5:

✅ Validation status: passed

File Status Preview URL Details
articles/active-directory-b2c/data-residency.md ✅Succeeded

For more details, please refer to the build report.

For any questions, please:

@ttorble
Copy link
Contributor

ttorble commented Jan 10, 2025

@kengaderdus

Can you review the proposed changes?

IMPORTANT: When the changes are ready for publication, adding a #sign-off comment is the best way to signal that the PR is ready for the review team to merge.

#label:"aq-pr-triaged"
@MicrosoftDocs/public-repo-pr-review-team

@prmerger-automator prmerger-automator bot added the aq-pr-triaged tracking label for the PR review team label Jan 10, 2025
@juntakata
Copy link
Contributor

juntakata commented Jan 15, 2025

When a B2C tenant is created specifying Japan as a tenant location, the tenant is allocated 310k (250k + 15k x 4) quota regardless of Go-Local data residency option. Even if the Go-Local data residency option is disabled, the new tenant is allocated 310k quota if the tenant location is Japan. If a verified custom domain is added to the tenant, the quota is expanded to 570k (250k + 80k x 4).

@rpakala-ms will make necessary corrections to the PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants