-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 311
Add MseeP.ai badge #139
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Add MseeP.ai badge #139
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @lwsinclair, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request primarily integrates a MseeP.ai security assessment badge into the project's README.md file. It also serves to communicate a recent security assessment conducted by MseeP.ai for the mcp-feedback-enhanced project, detailing their findings and overall risk evaluation.
Highlights
- README Update: A MseeP.ai security assessment badge, linking to their detailed report for
mcp-feedback-enhanced, has been added to the very top of theREADME.mdfile. - Security Assessment Summary: The pull request description includes a summary of a security scan performed by MseeP.ai, reporting a 'low' risk level with a score of 97/100. It highlights one medium severity issue (use of
subprocesswithshell=Trueinscripts/release.py) and two low severity issues.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request adds a security assessment badge from MseeP.ai to the README.md file. Consider addressing the security vulnerability mentioned in the PR description regarding subprocess with shell=True in scripts/release.py in a separate pull request.
| @@ -1,3 +1,5 @@ | |||
| [](https://mseep.ai/app/minidoracat-mcp-feedback-enhanced) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider placing the badge after the main project title for better document structure and readability. It's more conventional to have badges and metadata follow the main header.
| [](https://mseep.ai/app/minidoracat-mcp-feedback-enhanced) | |
| # MCP Feedback Enhanced | |
| [](https://mseep.ai/app/minidoracat-mcp-feedback-enhanced) |
Hi there,
This pull request shares a security update on mcp-feedback-enhanced.
We also have an entry for mcp-feedback-enhanced in our directory, MseeP.ai, where we provide regular security and trust updates on your app.
We invite you to add our badge for your MCP server to your README to help your users learn from a third party that provides ongoing validation of mcp-feedback-enhanced.
You can easily take control over your listing for free: visit it at https://mseep.ai/app/minidoracat-mcp-feedback-enhanced.
Yours Sincerely,
Lawrence W. Sinclair
CEO/SkyDeck AI
Founder of MseeP.ai
MCP servers you can trust
Here are our latest evaluation results of mcp-feedback-enhanced
Security Scan Results
Security Score: 97/100
Risk Level: low
Scan Date: 2025-06-17
Score starts at 100, deducts points for security issues, and adds points for security best practices
Security Findings
Medium Severity Issues
Low Severity Issues
This security assessment was conducted by MseeP.ai, an independent security validation service for MCP servers. Visit our website to learn more about our security reviews.