Skip to content

feat: added processAnchorRefund function#115

Open
Day-veed wants to merge 1 commit intoMissBlue00:mainfrom
Day-veed:processAnchorRefund
Open

feat: added processAnchorRefund function#115
Day-veed wants to merge 1 commit intoMissBlue00:mainfrom
Day-veed:processAnchorRefund

Conversation

@Day-veed
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@Day-veed Day-veed commented Mar 24, 2026

Description

Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed. Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change.

Fixes # (issue)
#88 Add processAnchorRefund function

Type of change

Closes #88 Add processAnchorRefund function

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration

I added a Jest unit test suite in packages/anchor-service/src/index.spec.ts that covers all refund scenarios:

Test A: Full refund – Verifies a failed transaction is fully refunded and status updates to refunded
Test B: Partial refund – Verifies partial refund handling and status updates to partially_refunded
Test C: Skip when not failed – Verifies no refund is processed when transaction status isn’t failed
Test D: Refund executor failure – Verifies transaction status is set to refund_failed and error is rethrown
Test Configuration:

Framework: Jest with ts-jest
TypeScript: Strict mode enabled
Environment: Node
Dependencies: In-memory mocks for AnchorTransactionRepository and AnchorRefundExecutor
To run tests:
pnpm --filter @stellar-pay/anchor-service test

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

@vercel
Copy link
Copy Markdown

vercel bot commented Mar 24, 2026

@Day-veed is attempting to deploy a commit to the missblue00's projects Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

@drips-wave
Copy link
Copy Markdown

drips-wave bot commented Mar 25, 2026

@Day-veed Great news! 🎉 Based on an automated assessment of this PR, the linked Wave issue(s) no longer count against your application limits.

You can now already apply to more issues while waiting for a review of this PR. Keep up the great work! 🚀

Learn more about application limits

@MissBlue00
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@Day-veed the ci/cd checks failed, please resolve

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add processAnchorRefund function

2 participants