feat: orchestrate between the numeric and prompt optimizations - #1860
Open
gabwow wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
feat: orchestrate between the numeric and prompt optimizations#1860gabwow wants to merge 1 commit into
gabwow wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Contributor
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Enterprise Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (11)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 12 included reviews per hour; 10 remain after this review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe optimization router now supports sequential numeric and prompt phases. It validates phase configuration, carries payloads and trial offsets between phases, records failures and skipped phases, and persists intermediate and combined artifacts. ChangesOptimization phase validation
Trial and failure metadata
Sequential phase orchestration
Job outputs and integration coverage
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant dispatch_payload
participant _run_phases
participant NumericBackend
participant PromptBackend
participant ArtifactWriter
dispatch_payload->>_run_phases: phase configuration and initial payload
_run_phases->>NumericBackend: numeric phase request with trial offset
NumericBackend-->>_run_phases: numeric result and optimized payload
_run_phases->>PromptBackend: prompt phase request with handed-off payload
PromptBackend-->>_run_phases: prompt result and optimized payload
_run_phases->>ArtifactWriter: phase details and combined result
ArtifactWriter-->>dispatch_payload: persisted artifacts and final result
Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to No actionable merge-blocking risk remains in the multi-phase orchestration changes. 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Full details: Docstring CoverageExplanation Docstring coverage is 11.11% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 72 functions across 10 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.)
✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1📝 Generate docstrings 💡
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
Contributor
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Related Issue
Changes
Type of Change
Quality Gates
Verification
Signed-off-by:traileruv run pre-commit run -apasses, or any blocked checks are identified belowTargeted validation:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
enabledvalues from being silently treated as disabled.