Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change to MIT License - when this pull request is approved by all authors the License can be changed #116

Draft
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

inforithmics
Copy link

@inforithmics inforithmics commented Mar 29, 2024

I think if all authors of ProjNET4GeoApi approve this pull request then the licence of this repository can be changed.

Github Committers:

Copyright in Source Code:

MIT licensed Projection Liberaries for replacing Code:

PROJ:
https://github.com/OSGeo/PROJ/
https://proj.org/en/9.4/

@inforithmics inforithmics changed the title Add MIT License, when this pull request is approved by all authors the License can be changed Change to MIT License, when this pull request is approved by all authors the License can be changed Mar 29, 2024
@inforithmics inforithmics changed the title Change to MIT License, when this pull request is approved by all authors the License can be changed Change to MIT License - when this pull request is approved by all authors the License can be changed Mar 29, 2024
@inforithmics inforithmics marked this pull request as draft March 29, 2024 21:26
Copy link
Contributor

@sguimmara sguimmara left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok for me

@airbreather
Copy link
Member

airbreather commented Mar 30, 2024

For my contributions, count me in. However, this list is incomplete. It's missing Urban Science Applications, Inc., since some of ProjNET was originally based on GeoTools.Net. One example file (out of 12):

// SOURCECODE IS MODIFIED FROM ANOTHER WORK AND IS ORIGINALLY BASED ON GeoTools.NET:
/*
* Copyright (C) 2002 Urban Science Applications, Inc.
*
* This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
* modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
* License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
* version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
*
* This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
* Lesser General Public License for more details.
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
* License along with this library; if not, write to the Free Software
* Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA
*
*/

That company is still around, so at least there's a chance. In fact, they're my current employer, but I need to be upfront and say that I do not expect my employment relationship with this company to make a difference in the outcome if someone were to contact them to try to get them to agree to this change.

@inforithmics
Copy link
Author

inforithmics commented Mar 30, 2024

@airbreather I can try to contact them too. When you have some contact information.

@airbreather
Copy link
Member

contact information

I'm not sure what the most appropriate e-mail address would be, and the public-facing corporate website doesn't go out of its way to help with that either. Try mailing a letter to the "World Headquarters" address (the Detroit one) listed on https://www.urbanscience.com/locations. That should reach the people who can make this decision.

Copy link
Contributor

@jarobbins jarobbins left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm ok with the MIT license.

@DGuidi
Copy link
Contributor

DGuidi commented Apr 2, 2024

ok for me

@FObermaier
Copy link
Member

We have a CLA in place that gives "NetTopologySuite-Team" the right to re-license this project.
I think this was @xivk's contribution to this project. So any change that has been made in the recent years is covered without approval.

@airbreather
Copy link
Member

This seems to be a copy of the original GeoTools.Net Code https://github.com/brandur/geotools

Not exactly. It's still up over at SourceForge, I'll see if I can migrate it to Git and throw an archival copy of it up on GitHub, if you would find this useful.

@airbreather
Copy link
Member

I'll see if I can migrate it to Git and throw an archival copy of it up on GitHub, if you would find this useful.

Easy enough... Git isn't quite expressive enough to perfectly represent everything from CVS, but I think this is pretty close: https://github.com/airbreather/GeotoolsNetArchive

@becio
Copy link

becio commented Apr 17, 2024

ok

@inforithmics
Copy link
Author

inforithmics commented Jul 13, 2024

We have a CLA in place that gives "NetTopologySuite-Team" the right to re-license this project. I think this was @xivk's contribution to this project. So any change that has been made in the recent years is covered without approval.

I saw that the CLA Assistant is not yet enabled for this repository. Should I try to enable it (I don't know if I have the permissions to do it).

@inforithmics
Copy link
Author

inforithmics commented Jul 14, 2024

We have a CLA in place that gives "NetTopologySuite-Team" the right to re-license this project. I think this was @xivk's contribution to this project. So any change that has been made in the recent years is covered without approval.

I saw that the CLA Assistant is not yet enabled for this repository. Should I try to enable it (I don't know if I have the permissions to do it).

I saw that the CLA Assistant is already active, around which Date was it activated, Because I don't have administrative access i don't see it. (Looking at pull requests before on Oct 28, 2019)
see this pull request #58

Should be visible here
https://github.com/NetTopologySuite/ProjNet4GeoAPI/settings/hooks

@xivk
Copy link
Contributor

xivk commented Jul 14, 2024

This is ok for me!

@jhaverkost
Copy link
Contributor

I signed the CLA so feel free to relicense my contributions as needed. Good luck.

@tommygebhardt
Copy link
Contributor

Good with me

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.