Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

oterm: 0.8.0 -> 0.8.1 #378400

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

oterm: 0.8.0 -> 0.8.1 #378400

wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

gaelj
Copy link
Contributor

@gaelj gaelj commented Feb 1, 2025

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 25.05 Release Notes (or backporting 24.11 and 25.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@github-actions github-actions bot added 6.topic: python 8.has: maintainer-list (update) This PR changes `maintainers/maintainer-list.nix` labels Feb 1, 2025
@nix-owners nix-owners bot requested a review from natsukium February 1, 2025 01:31
@nix-owners nix-owners bot requested a review from suhr February 1, 2025 01:38
@SuperSandro2000 SuperSandro2000 changed the title oterm: 0.8.0 -> 0.8.1 oterm: 0.8.0 -> 0.8.1 Feb 1, 2025

pythonImportsCheck = [ "mcp" ];

# no tests implemented
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for pointing this out ; i fixed this oversight

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
let
self = buildPythonPackage rec {
pname = "pydantic-settings";
version = "2.5.2";
version = "2.7.1";
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this absolutely necessary? Because that must go to staging and probably causes regressions

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, MCP needed this version to build unfortunately.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Try pythonRelaxDeps = [ "pydantic-settings" ] instead.
Upstream also relaxed the requirement modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk@0d48a44

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice, it works !

@gaelj gaelj mentioned this pull request Feb 1, 2025
13 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants