noresm3_0_025_cam6_4_121: Re-introduce the Bennartz mg diagnostics#250
Conversation
|
The coding in NorESM2 for these variables may not have been done properly. The output fields will pass a monthly restart test, but does it also pass a daily restart test for these fields? |
We can find out for sure when we run tests (if we add |
|
I am afraid that will have to be in early January so at the moment it can be added to aerocom if it is expensive |
Fixed issues with mixing of variables defined of different sets of columns.
gold2718
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The changes look good, thanks.
I would like one more change to move computation into the hist_field_active logic.
… calculate ncal_grid based on subcolumn usage
gold2718
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This looks good now, thanks for the cleanup.
|
Tagged as |
Re-introduction of few diagnostics in the microphysics
Some diagnostics in the microphysics did not make it through the pumas microphysics update. This PR re-introduces those diagnostics (the Bennartz mg diagnostics
CCN_B,ACTNL_BandFCTL_B).Contributors: @Ovewh
Reviewers: @gold2718 @oyvindseland
Changes made to build system: None
Changes made to the namelist: None
Changes to the defaults for the boundary datasets: None
Substantial timing or memory changes: None
Non-answer changing