Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding waiting (-w) in iptables for wg-iptables service #112

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Perlover
Copy link

At one point I overloaded the server and Wireguard was not working on it. I began to understand and found out that the wg-iptables service did not start. The logs were:

May 19 17:50:27 server.domain iptables[714]: Another app is currently holding the xtables lock. Perhaps you want to use the -w option?
May 19 17:50:27 server.domain systemd[1]: wg-iptables.service: Main process exited, code=exited, status=4/NOPERMISSION
May 19 17:50:27 server.domain systemd[1]: wg-iptables.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'.
May 19 17:50:27 server.domain systemd[1]: Failed to start wg-iptables.service.

Then I started googling this problem and found out that the problem is that your startup commands do not specify to wait in case of blocking. This patch fixes the problem.

Perlover added 2 commits May 19, 2023 18:17
At one point I overloaded the server and Wireguard was not working on it. I began to understand and found out that the `wg-iptables` service did not start. The logs were:

```
May 19 17:50:27 server.domain iptables[714]: Another app is currently holding the xtables lock. Perhaps you want to use the -w option?
May 19 17:50:27 server.domain systemd[1]: wg-iptables.service: Main process exited, code=exited, status=4/NOPERMISSION
May 19 17:50:27 server.domain systemd[1]: wg-iptables.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'.
May 19 17:50:27 server.domain systemd[1]: Failed to start wg-iptables.service.

```

Then I started googling this problem [and found out](https://lists.zx2c4.com/pipermail/wireguard/2019-October/004592.html) that the problem is that your startup commands do not specify to wait in case of blocking. This patch fixes the problem.
@KaeTuuN
Copy link

KaeTuuN commented Jul 5, 2023

@Nyr I would love to see that merged!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants