-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
[MIG] sale_order_line_remove: Migration to 18.0 #3632
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: 18.0
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
/ocabot migration sale_order_line_remove |
BhaveshHeliconia
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Funtional test LG.
matteonext
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
|
This PR has the |
ivs-cetmix
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @JochenDeBie , please squash administrative commits (if any) with the previous commit for reducing commit noise. Check the migration wiki for details, ensue that you have followed all the steps of that document.
Please prefix your pr with the version tag as well: [18.0][MIG]....
ivs-cetmix
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you!
767adb3 to
82ec9bf
Compare
|
Hi @JochenDeBie, commits are good now, please fix the tests. |
|
@ivs-cetmix Not really sure what to do with this one. The test that is failing now was added in another module to specifically check that confirmed SO lines can't be removed, which is the purpose of this module: |
Looks like we need to use |
|
Hello, what's the state of this PR? @ivs-cetmix @JochenDeBie I can help if needed. |
ivs-cetmix
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code review LGTM
Hi @ArnauCForgeFlow , thank you! Could you please check how we can solve an issue with those tests falling? |
|
@ivs-cetmix @JochenDeBie I think rebel modules are needed here. I don’t have much experience with rebel modules, but I think you need to update the copier answers and include this module as a rebel module. |
|
That's the
Unfortunately I don't have much experience with them either. Would appreciate if @rousseldenis @sbidoul or @dreispt could give a helper hand here. |
No description provided.