Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[16.0][ADD] base_user_effective_permissions #225

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: 16.0
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

hbrunn
Copy link
Member

@hbrunn hbrunn commented Jul 6, 2023

This module shows administrators a combined view of access rights and record rules per model with expressions expanded. This is convenient for reviewing permissions.

image

@hbrunn hbrunn changed the title [ADD] base_user_effective_permissions [16.0][ADD] base_user_effective_permissions Jul 6, 2023
@hbrunn hbrunn added this to the 16.0 milestone Jul 6, 2023
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 5, 2023

There hasn't been any activity on this pull request in the past 4 months, so it has been marked as stale and it will be closed automatically if no further activity occurs in the next 30 days.
If you want this PR to never become stale, please ask a PSC member to apply the "no stale" label.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale PR/Issue without recent activity, it'll be soon closed automatically. label Nov 5, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Dec 17, 2023
@thomaspaulb thomaspaulb reopened this Jun 7, 2024
@thomaspaulb
Copy link

/ocabot rebase

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations, PR rebased to 16.0.

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot force-pushed the 16.0-base_user_effective_permissions branch from b28e4c0 to 7b1891f Compare June 7, 2024 19:19
Copy link

@thomaspaulb thomaspaulb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very nice feature

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the stale PR/Issue without recent activity, it'll be soon closed automatically. label Jun 9, 2024
Copy link

There hasn't been any activity on this pull request in the past 4 months, so it has been marked as stale and it will be closed automatically if no further activity occurs in the next 30 days.
If you want this PR to never become stale, please ask a PSC member to apply the "no stale" label.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale PR/Issue without recent activity, it'll be soon closed automatically. label Oct 13, 2024
@bosd
Copy link

bosd commented Oct 14, 2024

@hbrunn Can you please retrigger a runboat?

@thomaspaulb
Copy link

thomaspaulb commented Oct 14, 2024 via email

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations, PR rebased to 16.0.

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot force-pushed the 16.0-base_user_effective_permissions branch from 7b1891f to b1b76d7 Compare October 14, 2024 13:38
@bosd
Copy link

bosd commented Oct 14, 2024

You can do it with

Yeah, but sadly the stupid bot doesn't listen to me. One needs to be the author or maintainer.

Luckily the 🤖 listens to you.

Copy link

@bosd bosd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 👍 , Just some minor non-blocking questions/remarks.

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
To use this module, you need to:
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
To use this module, you need to:
To use this module, you need to be in developer mode and:

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we need to keep the .empty files?

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR has the approved label and has been created more than 5 days ago. It should therefore be ready to merge by a maintainer (or a PSC member if the concerned addon has no declared maintainer). 🤖

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the stale PR/Issue without recent activity, it'll be soon closed automatically. label Oct 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants