Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix issue 719 #739

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 19, 2023
Merged

Fix issue 719 #739

merged 4 commits into from
Jul 19, 2023

Conversation

Halbaroth
Copy link
Collaborator

@Halbaroth Halbaroth commented Jul 18, 2023

Please, do not merge this PR before #738.

@Halbaroth Halbaroth linked an issue Jul 18, 2023 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link
Collaborator

@bclement-ocp bclement-ocp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, we already have a consistent flag! That is easier than I thought it'd be :)

Can we drop 27c220a and merge? It doesn't look like there are conflicts between the two PRs.

@Halbaroth Halbaroth merged commit 3fc32d3 into OCamlPro:next Jul 19, 2023
9 of 10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

get-model prints models even if the status of the goal is unsat
2 participants