Skip to content

Comments

Websockets 2695 v16#10375

Closed
catenacyber wants to merge 10 commits intoOISF:masterfrom
catenacyber:websockets-2695-v16
Closed

Websockets 2695 v16#10375
catenacyber wants to merge 10 commits intoOISF:masterfrom
catenacyber:websockets-2695-v16

Conversation

@catenacyber
Copy link
Contributor

Link to redmine ticket:
https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/2695

Describe changes:

SV_BRANCH=pr/1571

OISF/suricata-verify#1571

#10176 with rebase on top of #10370 (and doc fix for websocket.opcode being 8-bit and 32-bit)

catenacyber and others added 8 commits February 12, 2024 14:52
if no config option is found,
as is done for udp

Ticket: 6304
Including the one for websocket over HTTP/2
port is used in AppLayerProtoDetectProbingParserPort
and not in AppLayerProtoDetectProbingParserElement
As for WebSocket which is detected only by protocol change.
When there is a protocol change, and a specific protocol is
expected, like WebSeocket, always run it, no matter the port.
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 12, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: 66 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (9fe00ff) 82.52% compared to head (3affcaa) 82.44%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #10375      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   82.52%   82.44%   -0.09%     
==========================================
  Files         978      971       -7     
  Lines      272148   272227      +79     
==========================================
- Hits       224595   224434     -161     
- Misses      47553    47793     +240     
Flag Coverage Δ
fuzzcorpus 63.50% <61.98%> (-0.10%) ⬇️
suricata-verify 61.92% <82.90%> (+0.03%) ⬆️
unittests 62.83% <24.42%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@ct0br0
Copy link

ct0br0 commented Feb 13, 2024

This QA pipeline got stuck on the last job but looks normal (as far as anything does currently) aside from TLPR1

stat baseline test %
.tcp.pseudo 2810 3014 107.26%

@OISF OISF deleted a comment from suricata-qa Feb 13, 2024
@catenacyber
Copy link
Contributor Author

Rebased in #10409

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants