Closed
Conversation
This implementation adds types and filters specified in the LDAP RFC to work with the ldap_parser. Although using the parser directly would be best, strange behavior has been observed during transaction logging. It appears that C pointers are being overwritten, leading to incorrect output when LDAP fields are logged.
glongo
requested review from
a team,
jasonish,
jufajardini and
victorjulien
as code owners
Member
|
CI is quite red, can you look into that? |
Contributor
Author
|
Replaced with #11360 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Make sure these boxes are signed before submitting your Pull Request -- thank you.
https://docs.suricata.io/en/latest/devguide/contributing/contribution-process.html
https://suricata.io/about/contribution-agreement/ (note: this is only required once)
https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/projects/suricata/issues
(if applicable)
Link to ticket: https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/1199
Describe changes:
I still haven't made any changes regarding logging (#11163 (comment)).
The protocol itself seems to be very verbose, so I will leave this point open for discussion.
SV_BRANCH=OISF/suricata-verify#1860