Closed
Conversation
by making tx parsing and creation more easily available, without needing a dns state. Dns event NotResponse is now set on the right tx, and not the one before. Also debug log for Z-flag on request says "request" instead of "response" Also rustfmt dns.rs
Ticket: 5773
Ticket: 5773
Ticket: 5773
Now a flow alproto can be changed by a call to AppLayerParserParse when HTTP2 forces the flow to turn into DOH2.
Ticket: 5773 Handles both directions the same way for data if content type is application/dns-message
So as to consume less memory for HTTP2Transaction
|
WARNING: ERROR: QA failed on SURI_TLPR1_alerts_cmp.
Pipeline 21233 |
Contributor
Author
|
Continued in #11376 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Link to redmine ticket:
https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/5773
Describe changes:
SV_BRANCH=OISF/suricata-verify#1734
#11292 with review taken into account in the 2 latest commits.
@victorjulien should I squash these commits in ?
Draft because of TODO :