Closed
Conversation
so that future lua code can specify a direction
Since hooks, we do not need a specific SMTP buffer list id.
Ticket: 7605
Closed
|
Information: QA ran without warnings. Pipeline 25986 |
inashivb
reviewed
May 5, 2025
Member
inashivb
left a comment
inashivb
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looking good. One minor comment inline and a question.
jasonish
reviewed
May 5, 2025
jasonish
reviewed
May 5, 2025
Closed
Contributor
Author
|
Next version in #13168 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Link to ticket: https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/
https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/7605
Describe changes:
SV_BRANCH=OISF/suricata-verify#2482
#13153 with clean PR history