Skip to content

fuzz: forbid usage of pcre with \X backport8 - #15688

Merged
victorjulien merged 1 commit into
OISF:main-8.0.xfrom
catenacyber:fuzz-pcre-8634-backport8
Jun 23, 2026
Merged

fuzz: forbid usage of pcre with \X backport8#15688
victorjulien merged 1 commit into
OISF:main-8.0.xfrom
catenacyber:fuzz-pcre-8634-backport8

Conversation

@catenacyber

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Link to ticket: https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/8634

Describe changes:

Ticket: 8634
(cherry picked from commit 097975e)
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jun 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 81.64%. Comparing base (2b924d4) to head (f45b8f7).

Additional details and impacted files
@@              Coverage Diff               @@
##           main-8.0.x   #15688      +/-   ##
==============================================
- Coverage       81.65%   81.64%   -0.01%     
==============================================
  Files            1016     1016              
  Lines          276653   276663      +10     
==============================================
- Hits           225890   225874      -16     
- Misses          50763    50789      +26     
Flag Coverage Δ
fuzzcorpus 63.81% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
livemode 18.66% <ø> (-0.14%) ⬇️
netns 20.16% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
pcap 44.36% <ø> (-0.04%) ⬇️
suricata-verify 65.08% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️
unittests 58.61% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@suricata-qa

Copy link
Copy Markdown

WARNING:

field baseline test %
SURI_TLPW2_autofp_stats_chk
.uptime 185 178 96.22%

Pipeline = 32188

@victorjulien victorjulien added this to the 8.0 milestone Jun 22, 2026
@victorjulien
victorjulien merged commit f45b8f7 into OISF:main-8.0.x Jun 23, 2026
60 checks passed
@victorjulien

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Merged in #15709, thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants