-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 371
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
USGI PRE-PROD LOG #1874
USGI PRE-PROD LOG #1874
Conversation
|
GitGuardian id | GitGuardian status | Secret | Commit | Filename | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
- | - | Generic Password | 0706d35 | FIS13/USGI/FLOW_4/confirm_1_Response.json | View secret |
🛠 Guidelines to remediate hardcoded secrets
- Understand the implications of revoking this secret by investigating where it is used in your code.
- Replace and store your secret safely. Learn here the best practices.
- Revoke and rotate this secret.
- If possible, rewrite git history. Rewriting git history is not a trivial act. You might completely break other contributing developers' workflow and you risk accidentally deleting legitimate data.
To avoid such incidents in the future consider
- following these best practices for managing and storing secrets including API keys and other credentials
- install secret detection on pre-commit to catch secret before it leaves your machine and ease remediation.
🦉 GitGuardian detects secrets in your source code to help developers and security teams secure the modern development process. You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized GitGuardian to scan your pull request.
@shivadotnetcode
search_1
on_search_1
search_2
- multiple item objects can't be selectedon_search_2
select
on_select
select
init
on_init
confirm
on_confirm
Payemnt_Request
Payment_Response
Flow CLAIM
on_update
ON_UPDATE_CLAIM_3_Response
Flow CANCEL
on_update
|
@shivadotnetcode, it's a gentle reminder to provide updated logs. |
@shivadotnetcode, kindly provide updated transactional logs as well |
@sourabhsaini11 , We have uploaded Pre prod transaction log and resolved all the points .Request you to please reverify all the flow of transaction as well as IGM . |
Feedbacks for IGMOn_issue
On_issue_status
|
@shivadotnetcode
search
on_search
on_search_2
search_2
select
on_select_1
on_select
init
init_2
confirm
on_update
on_cancel
|
Hi Amit , |
on_update (LOG SUBMITTED)
on_cancel (LOG SUBMITTED)
Please find highlighted comments against each points and for that we required some discussion. As per logic we think it was correct which are passed as per ONDC flow. common_issues tag SETTLEMENT_AMOUNT value is incorrect. (USGI comments :- What should need to pass currently passing Zero. Please confirm the logic) search on_search on_search_2 (USGI comments :- In search_1 response we are passing only catalogue information with default values (Already discussed with Mohit) in Search_2 we are calculating the premium based on user entered IDV value from FORM1 page. This has already been discussed in team call with mohit and nivesh team. search_2 select on_select_1 (USGI comments :- In search_2 response we are passing premium based on FORM1 entered IDV value for all available Adon at USGI end and after user selection of addon category then we recalculating the premium based on selected addon in select1 call . So as per logic amount get changed in selec_1 response from insurer side.) on_select (USGI comments :- As checked above tag is available in FLOW2 (Rollover and transfer case). In New business case. Above tag was not applicable. init USGI comments :- (USGI comments :- Not at USGI end.) init_2 confirm Dear Team requests you to please arrange a team call with sourabhsaini11 or share the contact number so that we can discuused if there is any understaning required related to process flow . |
On_issue
On_issue_status
|
@shivadotnetcode
on_select_2
on_init
on_confirm
on_update
on_status
on_cancel
|
Hi Amit, We have reuploaded the IGM log. please reverify once and confirm |
Hi ,sourabhsaini11 |
Logs are approved for IGM 1.0 |
Dear sourabh, Please find below comments related to feedback points. Addon Prices in Different Searches (Search_1, Search_2, Select_1):
|
@shivadotnetcode
on_confirm
unsolicited_On_status_payment
unsolicited_On_staus_eKyc, unsolicited_On_staus_manual_review
unsolicited_On_status_update_claim
On_update_claim_1
on_cancel
|
We have resolved the highlighted feedback points and uploaded on ONDC verify GitHUb . |
Dear Sourabh, As discussed in today’s team call with Mohit, we agreed on the following logic regarding the feedback comments. On_Select: USGI Comments: • If the IDV value changes between the ONsearch_2 and On_Select1 API calls, the Premium will also change, which aligns with the expected logic. |
@shivadotnetcode
|
@shivadotnetcode, transactional-logs cleared. |
THANKS a lot.. |
USGI have completed Pre prod environment for Two Wheeler Motor insurance product for NEW and Transfer.
Below are the stage completed as of now
FLOW 1
FLOW 2
FLOW 3
FLOW 4