-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adding a link to the OG format checker #260
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
With more people using, we should more feedback on the OG-1.0 format and the checker itself. Helping new users addoption should help to mature the format.
Thank you @castelao, |
Can you add a link to the source for this checker? It would be much more efficient for us to run these checks locally on our files, rather than having to upload them to a website. See e.g. the IOOS compliance checker which has both a github repo and a website where files can be uploaded. |
@callumrollo, of course I know IOOS' checker. I think Ben did a great job. I just found out that I'm listed as a contributor! Thanks for expressing your concerns, but there is no reason to worry. As I said before in our meetings, the goal was always to have a web service and an application that anyone could run locally. Also, I appreciate your interest and insistence, but it's not yet time to open the source code. We still have some inconsistencies and flaws in the OG-1.0. For instance, what is your opinion on #256? Do you agree that including units and references in the Let's focus for now on what is already open source. Is there any particular reason to omit CoTeDe in the list of open source tools? You might want to add as well tools to encode and decode Iridium transmissions (note the binaries ready to be used!), a parser for BUFR messages (that's what I used when I was contributing to the glider BUFR template), and a robust implementation of GSW to run directly in microcontrollers of our gliders and sensors. |
Hi Gui, thanks for your interest in the gliders tools list! It's an ongoing and open project and as you have noted many tools have not yet been added. As the first section of the readme states, |
@emmerbodc , I added some minimum guidance in the checker website. @vturpin I need a second approve to merge this, if you agree with that. |
With more people using it, we should get more feedback on the OG-1.0 format and the checker itself. Helping new users adopt the format should help mature the full ecosystem.
Proponents:
Moderator: @OceanGlidersCommunity/format-mantainers
Type of PR
Related Issues
Related to #256. Once that issue is resolved, an update will be required on the checker.
Dates when it got review approvals
Release checklist
ask reviewers to update their review.
to merge.
according to the final decision.
For maintainers
best to have one single moderator to guide and help this PR to move
forward. It is OK to update the moderador pass it to another one.
Comments