You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi there, will the test/validation set include important object IDs (the "key_object_infos" dict)? If not, how will questions of subsequent steps (prediction/planning, etc.) be composed with the ID?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In issue #11@ChonghaoSima mentioned: "we assume the model already 'know' the key objects". Dose this imply that the model should be capable of identifying key objects even amidst varying c-id or locations from the predictions?
Thank you for a good question. We put some effort here to bypass the problem of id-issue.
The model still needs to identify the key objects.
If the model identifies the key objects with different id-number in the gt (the c-id in your sentence), we will use the IoU matching of the predicted and the GT 2D coordinate, to find the corrent object in your predicted answer. That being said, the c-id is not a matter here. You could have a look at our evaluation code about this.
Hi there, will the test/validation set include important object IDs (the "key_object_infos" dict)? If not, how will questions of subsequent steps (prediction/planning, etc.) be composed with the ID?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: