Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Aggregated coverage report without using codecov #2975

Conversation

maxemann96
Copy link
Contributor

What does this MR do?

It adds a new Gradle Plugin named JacocoLog. This plugin prints the instruction coverage to stdout.

Why is this MR needed?

We have a GitLab Pipeline without using codecov Bot. GitLab is able to directly consume the code coverage from the stdout of the build job. As we think this feature is useful for others, we wanted to share this contribution. It also mitigates an eventual future merge conflict in out fork.

@sfeilmeier sfeilmeier requested a review from da-Kai January 20, 2025 19:30
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 21, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Additional details and impacted files
@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             develop    #2975      +/-   ##
=============================================
+ Coverage      56.85%   58.54%   +1.70%     
+ Complexity      9800      127    -9673     
=============================================
  Files           2281     2377      +96     
  Lines          97624   102404    +4780     
  Branches        7208     7737     +529     
=============================================
+ Hits           55491    59945    +4454     
- Misses         40047    40201     +154     
- Partials        2086     2258     +172     

@sfeilmeier sfeilmeier merged commit b8f5deb into OpenEMS:develop Mar 4, 2025
7 checks passed
@maxemann96 maxemann96 deleted the feature/aggregated-report-without-codecov branch March 4, 2025 10:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants