Bump to v0.24. Updated to support Manifest v3 (MV3). #27
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Google started forcing MV2 extensions to disable, so this extension is going to be broken for most folks until a decision is made for how we proceed here. 😬
This change updates to v0.24 and switches from Manifest v2 (MV2) to Manifest v3 (MV3), which Google now requires for Chrome. The migration guide from Google was followed to make the changes.
The existing Chrome Store listing is managed via my personal Google Developer account, which is... not ideal. What's the best path forward here considering I no longer work for PagerDuty or have merge capability on this repository?
I've had 0.24 staged on the store and ready to go for while, but never made it live as ownership wasn't clear to me (then I forgot all about it, oops). I'm not comfortable updating the store listing to a new version until the changes are reflected in this repo, as this is where existing users expect the source code to be.
I see a few potential paths forward:
I'm fine with any of these options, but feel like (1) is the best path if PagerDuty want to own it, and (3) is the best path overall if PagerDuty no longer wish to have the maintenance burden. Both of those options make ownership clear and reduce confusion. Option (2) just keeps the status quo.
Let me know how you wish to proceed!