Skip to content

Conversation

@erikvansebille
Copy link
Member

So that we can use it to confirm no regressions on the interpolation schemes in v4 (see also #1869)

So that we can use it to confirm no regressions on the interpolation schemes in v4 (see also #1869)
@erikvansebille
Copy link
Member Author

I've now uploaded the zarr files, but see that these are quite big. Perhaps store the data in another format (netcdf?)

Because otherwise random generator may not yield the same fields
@VeckoTheGecko
Copy link
Contributor

VeckoTheGecko commented Feb 19, 2025

I've now uploaded the zarr files, but see that these are quite big. Perhaps store the data in another format (netcdf?)

Big in terms of line count, sure, but that's only because these attr files aren't binary so it shows the line count (+ the folder layout). In terms of raw size of the repo after the fact, I don't think there's much of a difference zarr/netcdf.

I think we can just go ahead with this - small files anyway.

@erikvansebille erikvansebille merged commit 00959f6 into main Feb 19, 2025
14 of 16 checks passed
@erikvansebille erikvansebille deleted the storing_interp_test_output_for_v4_testing branch February 19, 2025 16:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Scipy vs JIT interpolation test for v4

3 participants