Change docs header link to VirtualShip website #208
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Collaborator
Author
|
@erikvansebille @VeckoTheGecko is this what you imagined? Or shall we keep both links? |
erikvansebille
approved these changes
Sep 5, 2025
| user-guide/index | ||
| api/index | ||
| contributing/index | ||
| OceanParcels <https://oceanparcels.org> |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think "Website" or "VirtualShip Website" is better. Its clear from context that its for VirtualShip, and its unclear at the moment that its linking to the website
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As raised in #203, the header in the VirtualShip docs has a link to the Parcels website, whereas a link to the VirtualShip website makes more sense. This PR swaps the Parcels link for VirtualShip.