This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 24, 2021. It is now read-only.
extra consumers #555
Merged
extra consumers #555
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
The new test is still a bit unstable, I'll have to have another look. |
| @@ -170,6 +170,55 @@ def get_balanced_consumer(self, consumer_group, **kwargs): | |||
| **kwargs | |||
| ) | |||
|
|
|||
| def test_extra_consumer(self): | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
FYI @vitalyli this is what the test ended up looking like.
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This pull request fixes #527 by removing the upper limit on the number of consumers in a group. It also adds some tests to ensure that messages are not duplicated across a consumer group when there are more consumers than partitions.