Dependency updates for Debian packaging #163
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a Request For Package of this and someone mentioned in the Debian Rust team IRC channel, effectively fulfilling #150.
I made some efforts patching it for packaging, mostly aligning dependencies with what we have in Debian, and the result is this PR (thus not using the latest rustyline 14.0; it's not packaged yet). Includes #136, of which I wasn't aware until trying to create this PR, an unfortunate (?) oversight.
There's a problem with (supposedly) removing the libc-stdhandle workaround for rustyline. According to kkawakam/rustyline#599 there's a
rustyline::Behavior::PerferTermthat supposedly handles that, but the resulting jless just plain exits, without any error. I don't really have insight on this.