Merge pull request #201 from Phuire-Research/dx

Improving Developer Experience

ActionStrategy.md

@@ -47,9 +47,9 @@ export interface ActionNodeOptions {
   agreement?: number;
   decisionNodes?: Record<string, ActionNode>;
   decisionNotes?: ActionNotes;
-  successNode: ActionNode | null;
+  successNode?: ActionNode | null;
   successNotes?: ActionNotes;
-  failureNode: ActionNode | null;
+  failureNode?: ActionNode | null;
   failureNotes?: ActionNotes;
   lastActionNode?: ActionNode;
 }

Concept.md

@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ Using Force with Flint and Stone. Creates Sparks towards Dry Brush and Air, igni
 ```
 The above demonstrates the inherit conceptual quality of human language and highlights those concepts that may cascade some state changes into a subject. Such as the concept of sparks created from flint, stone, and force. Is an act of unifying some concepts spatially to form that of sparks. Which carry some transformational quality that can be applied to dry brush and the friction from air to create ignition and thusly fire. If this seems simple, that is the point. As we are introducing this simplicity to afford for greater explainability of the world around us. This would be the advent of a Unified Conceptual Formula.
 
-With our technology we may visit the exact Science that allows for this abstraction to exist. But for the majority, all that would matter is access to a developed library of knowledge that would facilitate such conceptualizations into reality for us. The goal is a system that is capable of: Car + Plane = Flying Car. And not only have such be created via some process, but the exact blueprints and the instructions for the rapid assembly to bring such into reality. Even better if we may simulate such before its creation and test to see if it is worthy to brought into reality in the first place.
+With our technology we may visit the exact logic that allows for this abstraction to exist. But for the majority, all that would matter is access to a developed library of knowledge that would facilitate such conceptualizations into reality for us. The goal is a system that is capable of: Car + Plane = Flying Car. And not only have such be created via some process, but the exact blueprints and the instructions for the rapid assembly to bring such into reality. Even better if we may simulate such before its creation and test to see if it is worthy to brought into reality in the first place.
 
 The difficulty of constructs. Is that you cannot readily decompose their qualities and how they interact with their parts to make that construct. That there is some information loss in the construction process. As constructs are just concepts, just like everything else. We are merely working with the most simplified terms possible, for the opportunity of greater arrangement of sets. That constructs themselves can have qualities, but likewise using such in this system of study we would determine their decomposed parts. This is the pursuit of the new Unified Conceptual Science that is being formalized.
 
@@ -113,9 +113,9 @@ This could be accomplished via some middleware approach within the actionStream.
 ## Closing thoughts on this Approach of Concepts
 The design of this approach is to be open and transparent of its implementations to encourage some exploration by others. As the goal is decomposability as a method of discovery towards some universal concepts. Which would be signified via stable concepts and qualities that are repeatedly reused between unlike concepts. And constitutes a form of efficiency upon discovery. As the truth of intelligence, is that the goal of communication by way of simplicity. Complexity may need be required for some highly entropic organization, but simplicity is the goal by way of explainability.
 
-As what point is some intelligent notion, without some shared reference? How can one know if what they hold is true and valid without testing. As a flawed individual, I would always choose chance of failure, over that of perfection for the sake of enhancing understanding. As intelligence is complex, but likewise within that complexity can one find themselves without that common point of reference. And this is my attempt to establish such. Noting that there are very few references throughout this work. And concepts take the center stage.
+As what point is some intelligent notion, without some shared reference? How can one know if what they hold is true and valid without testing. As a flawed individual, I would always choose chance of failure, over that of perfection for the sake of enhancing understanding. As intelligence is complex, but likewise within that complexity can one find themselves without that common point of reference. And this is my attempt to establish such. Noting that there are very few references throughout this work. And concepts and logical associations take the center stage.
 
-Beyond the scope of this application. Would be a method of being able to translate these concepts into any other language as they come into being. The power of intelligence comes from seeing the world as mundane, but respecting the decisions made. As even in the scope of this work. I never planned on creating a framework, nor a logical system to explain such. I attempted to extend FLUX to serve my own purpose with that ActionStrategy pattern. But at every turn, someone else's decision reared its head that hampered my ability to articulate the Unified Turing Machine.
+Beyond the scope of this application. Would be a method of being able to translate these concepts into any other language as they come into being. The power of intelligence comes from seeing the world as mundane, but respecting the decisions made. As even in the scope of this work. I never planned on creating a framework, nor the logical system that it represents. I attempted to extend FLUX to serve my own purpose with that ActionStrategy pattern. But at every turn, someone else's naming decision reared its head that hampered my ability to articulate the Unified Turing Machine.
 
 If my Own Work of Concepts gets in your way. Have fun!