Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "feat(taxref): add taxref_tree materialized view (#567)" #586

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

amandine-sahl
Copy link
Contributor

This reverts commit 8cd6d28.

@amandine-sahl amandine-sahl force-pushed the revert/vm_taxref branch 2 times, most recently from 8fe4fcd to b5305b9 Compare November 29, 2024 15:43
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 29, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 52.12%. Comparing base (18b662f) to head (08dfb74).

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #586      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    52.34%   52.12%   -0.22%     
===========================================
  Files           37       37              
  Lines         2432     2419      -13     
===========================================
- Hits          1273     1261      -12     
+ Misses        1159     1158       -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
pytest 52.12% <100.00%> (-0.22%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@bouttier
Copy link
Contributor

bouttier commented Dec 3, 2024

Ça fait partie de la release de la V2, donc ceux qui ont la v2 vont avoir un soucis avec la migration qui a disparu.

@bouttier
Copy link
Contributor

bouttier commented Dec 3, 2024

problème réglé j’espère par #587

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants