Skip to content

Describe the Brewer et al. treatment correctly - #10

Merged
vahid-ahmadi merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
brewer-treatment
Sep 2, 2026
Merged

vahid-ahmadi merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
brewer-treatment

Conversation

@vahid-ahmadi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The dashboard, README and sources.py said the −0.042 hours elasticity came from a treatment of 12.5 extra free hours a week. Table A.3 panel B (file page 41) is full-time eligibility — reception class, 30-35 hours a week (page 9) — relative to the part-time offer of 12.5-15 hours (page 8). The increment is roughly 15-20 hours, not 12.5. Text corrected in all three places; the elasticity, the overlap caveat and every number are unchanged. Artifacts regenerated for the source digest.

The +0.600 hours effect is full-time eligibility (30-35 hours a week)
relative to the part-time offer (12.5-15), not 12.5 extra hours. Found by a
review of the write-up; the elasticity and the overlap caveat are unchanged.
@vercel

vercel Bot commented Sep 2, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated
free-childcare-reform Ready Ready Preview Sep 2, 2026 3:38pm UTC

Request Review

@vahid-ahmadi
vahid-ahmadi merged commit ba56ebb into main Sep 2, 2026
4 checks passed
@vahid-ahmadi
vahid-ahmadi deleted the brewer-treatment branch September 2, 2026 15:41

This branch was successfully deployed

1 active deployment
Preview — c41c0041 Deployed Sep 2, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant