Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

You can now use PostHog for X less #8218

Closed
wants to merge 15 commits into from
72 changes: 72 additions & 0 deletions contents/blog/cheaper-analytics.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
---
date: 2024-03-21
title: 'PostHog is now up to X cheaper'
rootPage: /blog
joethreepwood marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
sidebar: Blog
showTitle: true
hideAnchor: true
author:
- james-hawkins
category: PostHog news
tags:
- Product updates
---

## tl;dr

* It is now possible to use PostHog for X less
* This change applies to all existing and new customers
* The average customer can save X%
* This cuts pricing for product analytics and web analytics
* We are intending on more price cuts, this is the start!
andyvan-ph marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

## Pricing before and after

| Tier (up to) | Personless Price (per event) | Previous pricing / our new pricing for events with person propertie |
joethreepwood marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
| ---- | ----- | ----- | ----- |
| 1M | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| 2M | $0.00002 | $0.000248 |
| 15M | $0.00002 | $0.000104 |
| 50M | $0.00002 | $0.0000655 |
| 100M | $0.00002 | $0.0000364 |
| 250M | $0.000009 *price changes here | $0.0000187 |
| ∞ | $0.000009 | $0.00001 |

(we can offer further discounts if you are beyond 250M events/month regardless - at that scale, we suggest you talk to us)
jamesefhawkins marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this line necessary? Makes me wonder why we'd even list a price at this level if we just go ahead and discount but not be transparent about the discount.

Maybe replace with:

Suggested change
(we can offer further discounts if you are beyond 250M events/month regardless - at that scale, we suggest you talk to us)
(we can offer further discounts for those paying more than $2k/mo on an annual contract - at that scale, we suggest you talk to us anyway)



<INSERT GRAPH SHOWING OUR PRICING CURVE BEFORE AND AFTER>

## Why we're excited to be the cheapest

* we think this makes us the best value product by a long way
* everyone else severely limits features available in their free or lower priced tiers - we don't
* we have resisted this temptation and think by changing slightly the data we capture, we can pass these savings a
* the markets we're in are commoditized - everyone's products are pretty similar
* we thinking prov

<INSERT GRAPH COMPARING US TO COMPETITORS>
joethreepwood marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

## What's the downside of sending this type of event?

If you are a price sensitive customer, we'd recommend you make this change for anonymous traffic.

The reason we don't recommend this for _all_ anonymous traffic if you are less price sensitive is that if you send persons without properties, there are some downsides of this tradeoff:

* users' profiles won't have any properties set (such as email addresses), so you won't be able to identify specific users
* you can't filter your visualizations based on user properties, or adjust targeting of cohorts based on them
* you won't be able to track users across multiple visits, multiple sites or across different devices - they will show up as separate users
jamesefhawkins marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
* you won't be able to use our "transformer" plugins - such as geoip
jamesefhawkins marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

All of our functionality, with the above limitations, will still work even at this dramatically lower price.
jamesefhawkins marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

## FAQs
andyvan-ph marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

* Is this change sustainable?
* Yes!
* out of all the major competitors we have, we believe we are by far the most efficient - we are 100% inbound and grow through word of mouth
* this pricing still reflects us making a positive margin on every event sold
* we suspect this will increase our word of mouth growth and increase our retention, so we are likely to make more revenue with this change, but at a lower margin
* the majority of our customers use multiple products that we offer, so we wind up making a little money off a lot of products - our competitors are not as wide, so we believe long term we can undercut.
* Why aren't you making the events with person properties cheaper too?
andyvan-ph marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
* Events with person properties cost a lot more for us to ingest and query. Allowing customers to choose to not send person properties for certain event types means we can cut our own costs of providing our product to our customers. This aligns our interests with our customers, and means we can make a positive margin on all events ingested (beyond our free tier) so it is sustainable but not greedy!
joethreepwood marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
andyvan-ph marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
Loading