Skip to content

Conversation

@engmohamedsalah
Copy link
Contributor

@engmohamedsalah engmohamedsalah commented Nov 21, 2025

Description

This PR improves the docstring for LocalNormalizedCrossCorrelationLoss to address the ambiguities identified in
#8350.

Problem

The current docstring does not clearly document:

  • The range of returned loss values
  • Whether the loss should be minimized or maximized
  • How to interpret high vs. low loss values

Solution

Enhanced the class docstring with comprehensive documentation including Returns section (value range, optimization
direction) and Note section (implementation details, interpretation guidelines).

Changes

  • Added Returns section with explicit value range and optimization direction
  • Added Note section explaining transformations and interpretation
  • Reorganized Args to class level for better discoverability
  • Followed MONAI formatting conventions

Testing

  • Verified docstring syntax is correct
  • Confirmed technical accuracy by analyzing implementation
  • Validated all three issue requirements are addressed

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 21, 2025

Walkthrough

Docstring-only modifications to LocalNormalizedCrossCorrelationLoss in monai/losses/image_dissimilarity.py: expanded class-level documentation (Args, Returns, Note, Interpretation) and removed the __init__ docstring. No changes to logic, parameters, control flow, or public signatures.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

  • Pure documentation updates with zero functional impact.

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed Title clearly references issue #8350 and accurately summarizes the main change: improving the LocalNormalizedCrossCorrelationLoss docstring.
Description check ✅ Passed Description covers the problem, solution, and changes made. However, some template sections are incomplete or missing.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting

Knowledge base: Disabled due to Reviews -> Disable Knowledge Base setting

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f5ec563 and 26e3ecc.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • monai/losses/image_dissimilarity.py (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • monai/losses/image_dissimilarity.py

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

…ocstring

- Add Returns section documenting value range (-1 to 0)
- Clarify optimization direction (minimize)
- Add Note section explaining transformations and interpretation
- Document that lower values indicate better correlation
- Move Args from __init__ to class docstring for better discoverability

Signed-off-by: Mohamed Salah <[email protected]>
Copy link
Member

@ericspod ericspod left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @engmohamedsalah thanks for the contribution. I think this is fine as it is so we can merge this soon.

@KumoLiu
Copy link
Contributor

KumoLiu commented Nov 24, 2025

/build

@KumoLiu KumoLiu enabled auto-merge (squash) November 24, 2025 02:36
@KumoLiu KumoLiu merged commit 9a45627 into Project-MONAI:dev Nov 24, 2025
27 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants