feat: Make carrier mapping from ppm to existing powerplants configurable #1562
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Changes proposed in this Pull Request
Translates hard-coded fueltype/technology to carrier maps like:
In the keys the first item refers to the Fueltype, the second to the Technology column in the values the first one is the technology (carrier of the link) and the second one the primary energy bus carrier.
I must say, i like in general how the right hand-side of the mapping is defined as a
technology_carrier
or maybetech_carrier
including both the tech and consumed fuel. Maybe that could be standardized and re-used.Checklist
envs/environment.yaml
.config/config.default.yaml
.doc/configtables/*.csv
.doc/data_sources.rst
.doc/release_notes.rst
is added. TODO