Conversation
Registry of QuantEcon automations and the label-coordination policy designed in the QEP-2 field-report thread: registering an automation grants a durable origin label and optionally a /-separated task namespace whose interior is the owner's contract, free to evolve without QEP amendment. Defines the mailbox semantics (apply=enqueue, owner-removes=complete, human-removes=cancel), the anti-loop rule, token mechanics, the grey-band colour allocation, and the prune/sync skip rules. Founding registrations: action-translation (translate/) and reports-activity's status-report. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Adds QEP-4 as a new Draft standard proposal defining a registry model for automation-owned coordination labels (origin labels + optional task namespaces), and registers it in the README index so it becomes part of the QEP registry.
Changes:
- Add QEP-4 document (
Draft,standard) describing registry fields, label tiers, and coordination semantics (“mailbox model”). - Add QEP-4 entry to the README index table.
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| README.md | Adds QEP-4 to the registry index with Draft status and unversioned –. |
| qeps/qep-0004-automation-registry-and-label-coordination.md | Introduces the QEP-4 draft content, including founding registrations and tooling implications. |
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)
qeps/qep-0004-automation-registry-and-label-coordination.md:105
- This reference to QEP-2 uses the same non-existent
qep-0002-standard-github-labels.mdrelative link, which will be broken when rendered. Update it to a valid target (e.g., the QEP-2 PR) to avoid dead links in the table.
| Family marker | `automated` | "was this made by a machine?" (org-wide union query) | Durable — every bot artifact ([QEP-2](qep-0002-standard-github-labels.md)) |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
…er mirror) The parity check that keeps the related frontmatter and the Related header-table row in lockstep lands with the qep-0002 branch's check.mjs; this branch carries the data it will validate once both merge. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Per the cross-QEP convention adopted in #9, QEP-2 holds no forward references to this in-review QEP; the registry hooks it drafted (Related pairing, origin/task-label policy, prune skip-rule, grey-band registration) are preserved here verbatim and re-applied to QEP-2 by this QEP's acceptance PR, in whatever form review settles. Rollout gains the matching amend-QEP-2 step. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
QEP-4: Automation Registry and Label Coordination
Status: Draft · Type: standard · Discussion: grew out of the QEP-2 field reports
QEP-2 standardises the human label vocabulary and a closed set of bot diagnostics, but field use surfaced a second kind of bot label it can't describe: labels automations use to coordinate —
action-translationrouting the Translation-Sync rollup,status-reportletting the weekly-reports workflow find its own issues. These contracts evolve with the tooling, so they shouldn't be baked into a QEP label-by-label. This QEP resolves that with a registrar model: the QEP allocates the boundary, the automation owns the interior.What it defines
action-translation, on every artifact it creates), an optional task prefix (short, capability-named,/-separated, e.g.translate/), a family grey from the#ededed–#bdbdbdband, a service area, and a contract link. Registration requires a documented consumer you can point at; adding/removing an entry is a substantive amendment, while everything inside a namespace never touches a QEP.automated(org-wide union query) and the origin label are durable; task labels are transient. Origin marks authorship, not participation.GITHUB_TOKENevents don't cascade, so bot→bot enqueueing requires a deliberately provisioned App/PAT: the human decision sits exactly where coordination power is granted. Humans trigger via the UI freely, floored by triage permission.syncnever touches a registered zone;pruneskips registered zones mechanically instead of relying on a human recognising a routing key.Founding registrations
action-translationaction-translationtranslate/#e5e5e5reports-activity(weekly reports)status-report#d5d5d5Relationship to QEP-2
QEP-2 keeps
automated+ the three diagnostics as core vocabulary and is now fully self-contained: under the cross-QEP convention adopted in #9, an in-review QEP is never forward-referenced by the standards it extends — instead this QEP carries the amendments to QEP-2. The draft's new Amendments to QEP-2 section preserves, verbatim, the registry hooks originally drafted inside QEP-2 during co-development (therelated:/Related pairing, the origin/task-label policy sentences, the prune skip-rule, the grey-band registration clause); the acceptance PR re-applies them in their review-settled form, bumping QEP-2'sversionif it is Accepted by then (Rollout step 2). The machine-readable registry (qep-0004-automations.yml, following QEP-2's companion-file pattern) ships at acceptance per the Rollout — the appendix CI check needs a small extension for the registry schema first.Decision deadline
To be set by the author once the draft has had a round of review.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code