-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
RHINENG-1197: fix meta links #1277
Conversation
Referenced Jiras: |
so we can put them back into links in meta section
Codecov ReportPatch coverage:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1277 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 60.54% 60.47% -0.08%
==========================================
Files 106 106
Lines 6631 6646 +15
==========================================
+ Hits 4015 4019 +4
- Misses 2085 2096 +11
Partials 531 531
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
/retest |
1 similar comment
/retest |
var validSystemProfileFilters = map[string]bool{ | ||
"sap_sids": true, | ||
"sap_system": true, | ||
"mssql": true, | ||
"mssql->version": true, | ||
"ansible": true, | ||
"ansible->controller_version": true, | ||
} | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
don't we need this map to allow only certain keywords for filter? We should be able to return 400 if user tries something like filter[system_profile][asdf]=asdf
but I don't know if we can do it with the old code or not
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we should make sure we don't break any checks for invalid filters if we have them now, I'd rely on unit tests and QE to provide an answer whether the functionality is correct or not
if it doesn't break any current checks for invalid filters, then LGTM
PR checks are broken until Brandon and app-sre make necessary changes
/retest |
There's couple of invalid filter tests, e.g. |
Secure Coding Practices Checklist GitHub Link
Secure Coding Checklist