Skip to content

Rebuild the NVDA sample without the label-term collision - #78

Merged
jfrench9 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
bugfix/nvda-sample-label-term
Sep 8, 2026
Merged

Rebuild the NVDA sample without the label-term collision#78
jfrench9 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
bugfix/nvda-sample-label-term

Conversation

@jfrench9

@jfrench9 jfrench9 commented Sep 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The sample refreshed in #77 was built on xbrlkit 0.7.2, which bound label to rs:label — a duplicate key in its canonical context silently shadowing the rdfs:label that was already there. It went live with the 06:13Z deploy, so the file the viewer opens to show what a holon is has been disagreeing with every platform-written holon about what one of its terms means.

Rebuilt on xbrlkit main with that fixed (xbrlkit #37):

label         → rdfs:label      (was: https://robosystems.ai/vocab/label)
standardLabel → rs:standardLabel  (XBRL's own name for the …/role/label role)

Only the term changes — same 1,425 elements, 1,219 facts, 382 networks as #77.

The viewer was never affected. It names concepts by rs:internalId, so it rendered correctly throughout; all 51 tests passed before and after. What was wrong is what a third party reading the file as JSON-LD would resolve — which is exactly what a reference sample invites someone to do.

One caveat worth stating: this is built from the merged fix rather than a published version. A 0.7.3 would make the sample reproducible from a pin.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01EiGTpXmxwZjxzaRoVs4VxB

The sample refreshed in #77 was built on xbrlkit 0.7.2, which bound `label` to
`rs:label` — a duplicate key in its canonical context silently shadowing the
`rdfs:label` that was already there. It went live with the 06:13Z deploy, so
the file the viewer opens to show what a holon *is* has been disagreeing with
every platform-written holon about what one of its terms means.

Rebuilt on xbrlkit main with that fixed (xbrlkit #37): `label` is `rdfs:label`
again and the standard-role label is `standardLabel`, XBRL's own name for it.
Only the term changes — same 1,425 elements, 1,219 facts, 382 networks.

The viewer itself was never affected: it names concepts by `rs:internalId`, so
it rendered correctly throughout. What was wrong is what a third party reading
the file as JSON-LD would resolve, which is precisely what a reference sample
invites someone to do.

Built from the merged fix rather than a published version — a 0.7.3 would make
this reproducible from a pin.
@jfrench9
jfrench9 merged commit 2671f5a into main Sep 8, 2026
4 checks passed
@jfrench9
jfrench9 deleted the bugfix/nvda-sample-label-term branch September 8, 2026 06:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant