regression: Room breaking if advanced cron timer is invalid

[gabriellsh]

Proposed changes (including videos or screenshots)

If the Advanced cron timer is invalid, the cron will not run, so the message was removed for this case.

Issue(s)

CORE-534

Steps to test or reproduce

Further comments

[changeset-bot]

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 88e4fbe

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

[dionisio-bot]

Looks like this PR is not ready to merge, because of the following issues:

• This PR is missing the 'stat: QA assured' label

Please fix the issues and try again

If you have any trouble, please check the PR guidelines

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 80.00000% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 56.68%. Comparing base (c3489db) to head (88e4fbe).
Report is 3 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop   #32687      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    56.70%   56.68%   -0.02%     
===========================================
  Files         2498     2494       -4     
  Lines        55390    55315      -75     
  Branches     11457    11445      -12     
===========================================
- Hits         31410    31357      -53     
+ Misses       21275    21258      -17     
+ Partials      2705     2700       -5     

Flag	Coverage Δ
e2e	56.44% <80.00%> (-0.03%)	⬇️
unit	71.86% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

[MarcosSpessatto]

Would it be possible to add tests to ensure the behavior? I think the case that was described in the steps to reproduce would be enough, WDYT?