Skip to content

Create coffee_pot.py #5

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
IneHerm wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Create coffee_pot.py #5

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
3764530
Create coffee_pot.py
IneHerm Sep 19, 2025
47bb173
another_one
IneHerm Sep 19, 2025
397b228
Add files via upload
IneHerm Dec 15, 2025
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
35 changes: 35 additions & 0 deletions coffee_pot.py
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
import sqlite3

# 🚨 Secret issue: hardcoded API key
API_KEY = "sk_test_51H6rSuperSecretKeyDontHardcode12345"

@trag-bot trag-bot Bot Sep 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The API key is hardcoded in the source code, which poses a security risk by exposing sensitive information. It should be stored securely, such as in environment variables.


def show_coffee_pot():
print("""

@aikido-pr-checks aikido-pr-checks Bot Dec 15, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ad-hoc debug print in show_coffee_pot() writes ASCII art to stdout and appears to be a leftover debug artifact.

Details

🔧 How do I fix it?
Remove debugging statements like console.log, debugger, dd(), or logic bypasses like || true. Keep legitimate logging for monitoring and error handling.

More info - Comment @AikidoSec feedback: [FEEDBACK] to get better review comments in the future.

( (
) )
........
| |]
\ /
`----'
""")

# 🚨 SAST issue #1: SQL Injection risk (unsanitized input in query)
def get_order(user_input):

@aikido-pr-checks aikido-pr-checks Bot Dec 15, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Function get_order lacks comments describing expected user_input format and sanitization responsibilities.

Details

✨ AI Reasoning
​​1) get_order(user_input) builds and executes an SQL query using user input to fetch orders.
​2) While a SAST comment flags SQL injection risk, there is no comment documenting the expected form of user_input, who supplies it, or whether it must be sanitized/escaped before use; this lack of explanatory comment makes the function's intended use and constraints unclear.
​3) This function is newly added in this diff and therefore its missing documentation is a new issue.

🔧 How do I fix it?
Review your code and add clear, concise comments that explain the 'why' behind complex logic, not just the 'what'. Use meaningful variable and function names to reduce the need for excessive comments. For larger code blocks, consider adding a brief summary comment. Regularly update comments when modifying code to ensure they remain accurate and relevant.

More info - Comment @AikidoSec feedback: [FEEDBACK] to get better review comments in the future.

conn = sqlite3.connect("coffee.db")
cursor = conn.cursor()
query = f"SELECT * FROM orders WHERE customer = '{user_input}'" # vulnerable

@aikido-pr-checks aikido-pr-checks Bot Sep 19, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Potential SQL injection via string-based query concatenation - critical severity
SQL injection might be possible in these locations, especially if the strings being concatenated are controlled via user input.

Remediation: If possible, rebuild the query to use prepared statements or an ORM. If that is not possible, make sure the user input is verified or sanitized. As an added layer of protection, we also recommend installing a WAF that blocks SQL injection attacks.
View details in Aikido Security

@trag-bot trag-bot Bot Sep 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The SQL query uses unsanitized user input, making it vulnerable to SQL injection attacks. Use parameterized queries to prevent this security risk.

cursor.execute(query)
return cursor.fetchall()

# 🚨 SAST issue #2 + 🚨 Code quality issue: no explanatory comments
def process_payment(card_number):

@aikido-pr-checks aikido-pr-checks Bot Dec 15, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Function process_payment has no explanatory comment or docstring describing input expectations and return semantics.

Details

✨ AI Reasoning
​​1) process_payment(card_number) validates a credit card number by checking its length and returning True/False.
​2) The function has no explanatory comment or docstring describing expected input format (e.g., digits-only, allowed separators), why the length check is sufficient, or what the return values mean, which harms readability and correct usage.
​3) This is a newly added function in this diff and therefore lacks necessary explanatory comments, so the violation is present.

🔧 How do I fix it?
Review your code and add clear, concise comments that explain the 'why' behind complex logic, not just the 'what'. Use meaningful variable and function names to reduce the need for excessive comments. For larger code blocks, consider adding a brief summary comment. Regularly update comments when modifying code to ensure they remain accurate and relevant.

More info - Comment @AikidoSec feedback: [FEEDBACK] to get better review comments in the future.

if len(card_number) < 16:
return False
return True


if __name__ == "__main__":
show_coffee_pot()
name = input("Enter your name: ")
print(get_order(name))

@aikido-pr-checks aikido-pr-checks Bot Dec 15, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ad-hoc debug print of get_order(name) in main writes query results to stdout and appears to be a leftover debug artifact.

Details

🔧 How do I fix it?
Remove debugging statements like console.log, debugger, dd(), or logic bypasses like || true. Keep legitimate logging for monitoring and error handling.

More info - Comment @AikidoSec feedback: [FEEDBACK] to get better review comments in the future.

print(process_payment("1234-5678-9012-3456"))