Update community.md

[jsonify]

These custom modes enhance Roo Code's capabilities by addressing critical software development lifecycle needs: the Documentation Writer mode ensures comprehensive technical documentation, the Junior and Senior Dev Reviewer modes provide targeted code review experiences for different skill levels, and the User Story Creator mode streamlines agile requirement gathering. Together, these modes create a more complete development ecosystem that supports documentation quality, code review effectiveness, and agile project management, making Roo Code a more versatile and valuable tool for development teams across different experience levels and responsibilities.

---

Important

Adds new custom modes to community.md for documentation, user story creation, and code review, enhancing Roo Code's development ecosystem.

• New Modes Added:
  • Documentation Writer: Focuses on creating clear, maintainable documentation with read, edit, and command capabilities.
  • User Story Creator: Provides structured templates for user stories, considering various story types and technical implications.
  • Junior Dev Code Reviewer: Offers educational code reviews for junior developers, with read and command access, and restricted edit capabilities for Markdown files.
  • Senior Dev Code Reviewer: Conducts high-level code reviews focusing on architecture, scalability, and security, with similar access restrictions as the junior reviewer mode.

^{This description was created by for 1bcf616. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.}

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to 1bcf616 in 3 minutes and 13 seconds

More details

• Looked at 97 lines of code in 1 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 9 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. docs/community.md:63

• Draft comment:
  Ensure consistency in JSON formatting and indentation across all custom mode definitions.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 33% <= threshold 50%
  None

2. docs/community.md:82

• Draft comment:
  The new mode definitions are clear and well-structured. Confirm consistency in style (headings, JSON blocks, and field naming) across all added modes.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 33% <= threshold 50%
  None

3. docs/community.md:101

• Draft comment:
  Check the groups array structure in the Junior Developer Code Reviewer block for consistency with other mode definitions.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 33% <= threshold 50%
  None

4. docs/community.md:126

• Draft comment:
  Ensure the Senior Developer Code Reviewer JSON block follows the same formatting conventions as the others.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 33% <= threshold 50%
  None

5. docs/community.md:67

• Draft comment:
  Ensure the JSON snippet for Documentation Writer doesn’t include trailing commas for strict JSON compliance.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment looked like it was already resolved.

6. docs/community.md:87

• Draft comment:
  Verify newline escape sequences in the roleDefinition of User Story Creator are consistent.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 33% <= threshold 50%
  None

7. docs/community.md:106

• Draft comment:
  Check that the nested array structure in the groups field for Junior Developer Code Reviewer remains valid JSON.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50%
  This comment is asking the PR author to check the validity of JSON, which is not a specific code suggestion or a request for a test. It violates the rule against asking the author to double-check things.

8. docs/community.md:131

• Draft comment:
  Confirm the structure and formatting of the Senior Developer Code Reviewer mode JSON matches the other mode definitions.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 33% <= threshold 50%
  None

9. docs/community.md:65

• Draft comment:
  Typo in the sentence 'A mode that is specialized technical documentation expert'. Consider revising it to 'A mode that is a specialized technical documentation expert' to include the missing article.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 0% vs. threshold = 50%
  While the comment correctly identifies a grammatical error, our rules state that we should focus on substantive issues that require code changes. Grammar fixes in documentation, while nice to have, are not critical enough to warrant a PR comment unless they significantly impact understanding. This is a minor grammatical issue that doesn't affect comprehension.
  The grammar error does make the sentence slightly awkward to read. Documentation clarity is important for user understanding.
  However, this is such a minor grammatical issue that it doesn't significantly impact understanding. The meaning is still clear despite the missing article.
  This comment should be deleted as it addresses a trivial grammatical issue rather than a substantive problem requiring code changes.

Workflow ID: wflow_ApB7qAz7peTF2im8

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

[mrubens]

🎉