Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use nr2.0 in typechecker #3253

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 21, 2024
Merged

Use nr2.0 in typechecker #3253

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 21, 2024

Conversation

powerboat9
Copy link
Contributor

@powerboat9 powerboat9 commented Nov 19, 2024

I probably missed a few spots, but this should cover most of the typechecker

@P-E-P P-E-P self-requested a review November 20, 2024 15:34
I probably missed a few spots, but this should cover most of the type
checker.

gcc/rust/ChangeLog:

	* typecheck/rust-hir-type-check-expr.cc: Add includes.
	(TypeCheckExpr::visit): Use name resolver 2.0.
	(TypeCheckExpr::resolve_operator_overload): Likewise.
	(TypeCheckExpr::resolve_fn_trait_call): Likewise.
	* typecheck/rust-hir-type-check-path.cc
	(TypeCheckExpr::visit): Likewise.
	(TypeCheckExpr::resolve_segments): Likewise.
	* typecheck/rust-hir-type-check-type.cc
	(TypeCheckType::resolve_segments): Likewise.
	(ResolveWhereClauseItem::visit): Likewise.
	(TypeCheckType::visit): Avoid usage of
	Resolver::get_unit_type_node_id when handling TupleType, use
	name resolver 2.0 when handling QualifiedPathInType.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* rust/compile/nr2/exclude: Remove entries.

Signed-off-by: Owen Avery <[email protected]>
Copy link
Member

@P-E-P P-E-P left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, missing spots will probably show up later with some failing tests.

@P-E-P P-E-P added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 21, 2024
Merged via the queue into Rust-GCC:master with commit 90454a9 Nov 21, 2024
12 checks passed
@powerboat9 powerboat9 deleted the fix-ty branch November 21, 2024 17:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants