plan(v1.2.0): planning charter, roadmap, and evidence-backed tech-deb… - #2
Conversation
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 988b7931c9
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| - LLM gateway sustains target load with no unhandled 429; alerting on provider exhaustion. | ||
| - Schema changes applied via migrations; no manual DB recreate in any runbook. | ||
| - Discord routing deterministic from config. | ||
| - At least one real CLI runtime (Gemini or Claude) integrated and validated live. | ||
| - Soak test (multi-hour unattended) passes with health alerting proven. | ||
| - Version strings consistent across source, config, and tags. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The charter lists Production web SearchProvider as in scope and the backlog says D-1…D-7 collectively define the Production Ready gate, but this gate omits D-5 entirely. If reviewers use §6 as the authoritative readiness checklist, v1.2 can be marked Production Ready while the agent's web tools still have no production SearchProvider, contradicting the v1.1 evidence-backed gap and the roadmap's Track S2 exit criteria.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
1 participant
…t backlog