Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update functional tests to use correct broker settings location #287

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 16, 2024

Conversation

tpapaioa
Copy link
Collaborator

Functional tests expected broker_settings.yaml to be present in the working directory. This PR updates those tests to look in the correct location, using broker.settings.settings_path (default: ~/.broker/broker_settings.yaml).

@tpapaioa tpapaioa marked this pull request as draft April 16, 2024 17:17
@tpapaioa tpapaioa force-pushed the test_broker_settings branch 2 times, most recently from e3eb747 to 242d3e4 Compare April 16, 2024 19:11
@tpapaioa
Copy link
Collaborator Author

$ pytest tests/functional/test_satlab.py -k 'test_tower_host and not mp'
[...]
collected 10 items / 9 deselected / 1 selected

tests/functional/test_satlab.py::test_tower_host PASSED  [100%]
[...]
=== 1 passed, 9 deselected, 4 warnings in 539.43s (0:08:59) ===

@tpapaioa tpapaioa marked this pull request as ready for review April 16, 2024 19:25
@JacobCallahan JacobCallahan changed the base branch from master to 0.5 April 16, 2024 19:27
@tpapaioa
Copy link
Collaborator Author

$ pytest tests/functional/test_satlab.py -k 'test_tower_host_mp'
[...]
collected 10 items / 9 deselected / 1 selected

tests/functional/test_satlab.py::test_tower_host_mp PASSED  [100%]
[...]
=== 1 passed, 9 deselected, 12 warnings in 505.52s (0:08:25) ===

@JacobCallahan JacobCallahan merged commit 5fa99d9 into SatelliteQE:0.5 Apr 16, 2024
4 checks passed
@tpapaioa tpapaioa deleted the test_broker_settings branch April 16, 2024 21:22
@tpapaioa
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Closes #212

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants