-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 1
#219 Isolate styling with shadow dom #253
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
robatwilliams
wants to merge
4
commits into
develop
Choose a base branch
from
219-isolate-estimator-styling-alt
base: develop
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+47
−9
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
b41c8f6
Use shadow dom and inject style-link tag manually in there
robatwilliams 7f859dc
Improve comment
robatwilliams 12422ce
Highlight styles file double meaning
robatwilliams b37993c
Consumers no longer need to manually import styles
robatwilliams File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seemed likely this needed to be removed, but I haven't seen it used - Dan, I guess you will when you try embedding it in the website.
With the style isolation, we are changing our ask of consumers from "include this in your global styles somewhere" to "put this file at
/styles.cssfor us". Which is very rigid.Perhaps we should allow the styles url to be given as a component attribute - including any path and cache-busting suffixes.
Having the whole bundled styles within the js bundle (so we can import it as a string rather than from a URL path) would eliminate the issue altogether, but then we're back into custom build system/tooling territory.
Why is it necessary to have separate sl-style and package-style? If we could have package-style be always used, we could specify it in
styleUrland simplify things a lot, and then do something else (e.g. style tag) for adaptations the demo page requires.